![]() |
www.combatreform2.com
|
![]() |
||
|
General David Grange's Air-Mech-Strike Study Group 2 (AMS-SG2) specializes in 2D/3D maneuver warfare concepts Iraqi Lessons Learned Study Group renamed in honor of British Army reformer, Richard Haldane as the HALDANEDODREFORMBOARD2 or "Haldanes" (HALDANE-DRB2) Chuck Myers' Maneuver Air Support Working Group 2 (MAS-WG2) eXtreme Soldiering Combat Light Working Group 2 (eXSCL-WG2) LAV-III Stryker wheeled truck FUBAR Group (LAV3STRYKERFUBAR2) 21st Century Rifle Controversy Group 2 (21CENTURYRIFLECONTROVERSY2)
Ranger Larry's Guns of The Internet (GOTI)
The Great Tank Debate 2 Research Group (THEGREATTANKDEBATE2)
Combat Engineering Study Group (ARMYSAPPERSFORWARD) The Naval Fire Support Battleship Modernization Working Group (NFSBBG-WG)
The Great Doctrine Debate III: 4th Generation Warfare Group (THEGREATDOCTRINEDEBATE3)
dedicated to the work of military futurist Dr. Martin van Crevald
For all military topics we have two general study groups:
Army Transformation 21st Century mailing list
Military Reform mailing list
The 1st TSG (A) assists U.S. civilian/military leaders and Soldiers
with studies, gear designs and professional military education materials
at no charge. We send out each month an inter-active, e-magazine focused
on ground maneuver; Land
Power Transformation 2 (LPT) and on air operations, U.S.
Army/Air Force Aviation Journal (AVJ) to our members at-large
New Articles as of January 29th, 2007
The Non-Linear Fight We are Now In: It takes MANEUVER, Tofflerian/RMA
NeoCons!
Former CIA Director Woolsey and Dr. Kopp expose what ISLAMO-FASCISM really is
LTC Gentry reveals RMA/netcentric mentalism is a dangerous, failed crutch!
Tale of two Colonels: Charles DeGaulle and Douglas MacGregor misunderstood
reformers
Improved Tank/Infantry cooperation for urban combat?
U.S. Army Reserves: Not Ready, but need to be ready for non-linear combat
Retired General David Grange begins Military Veterans Radio/WWW Sunday Night
Show
DoD: screwed up since 1947, how to fix it before its too late
U.S. Army needs Honor Code NOW
New book charts Army success path: Air-Mech-Strike: Asymmetric Maneuver
Warfare for the 21st Century
Study Group Member conducts first U.S. Army Air-Mech-Strike assault in
Afghanistan
Tofflerian
thinking poisoning U.S. military?
Afghanistan Primer: solving the "we don't do mountains" light-itis
non-sense
Tanks are Combat Engineer Vehicles
Soft-skin Army getting clobbered in Iraq: wheeled HMMWV trucks and inadequate Soldier protection
Shinseki gone: Stryker lies starting to come out: roll-over at NTC
Transform
the Army Airborne and Light Divisions' Delta Companies: it maneuvers a
Battalion
Army
censorship defeated: LAVDANGER web site online again revealing Stryker
deathtrap
Former
Speaker of the House Gingrich blows whistle on lav3stryker deathtrap
Wargame
cheating cannot save Army wheeled deathtrap: DoD considers canceling the
lav3stryker
Rubber-tired
LAV armored cars will not survive modern combats
Gavin's
Cavalry: light tracked M113 AAM/PVFs perfect for non-linear, lethal
modern battlefields
Hi-Technology
tracked 2nd ACR beats wheeled IBCTs
Heavy
tanks, helicopter fighter-bombers: U.S. Army in search of doctrine?
Army enlistedman/officer presents M113A3 transformation plan in 1995 ARMOR
magazine
Colonel
MacGregor's Airborne-Air Assault Battle Groups
How blind obedience creates bad decisions like LAV-III/Stryker trucks
Army says "wheels or walk!", ignores lighter tracks
Why doesn't the press expose the LAV-III/IAV scam?
Russian LAV-III equivalent armored car blown up in Chechnya (actual footage)
Tracks vs. Wheels 101: look at the drivetrains!
What if your LAV-III can't turn around on a mountain pass?
Official MTMC-TEA Study proves LAV-IIIs NOT C-130 transportable
Goodbye
armor, hello peacekeepers! Don Loughlin exposes LAV-III scam in Defense
Daily News
High-level
misconduct behind LAV-III scam
Light Mechanized Sapper Company (Airborne)
FM 7-7: Cross-country-capable, amphibious APC: rediscover a lost art
Ocean-going M113A3 AmphiGavins: key to speeding Army sealift
Australian Army upgrades its tracked M113s: East Timor victors by way of C-130
Spin:
Canadians call tracked M113s "TLAVs", can't admit wheeled
"LAVs" stink
Many
New Zealanders reject LAV-III deathtrap armored cars
Italian
Army has better adapted M113A3s
Defense
Daily News: AWSOM 2D/3D maneuver and firepower doctrine
How
tracked tanks can fly by leased cargo 747s (large armored cars can't)
Mechanized
Cavalry history: wheels a failure, no Cavalry Branch, No Cavalry
ALL
Future Combat System proposals wheeled: fantasy "cash cow" to
fleece America
Iraqi Combat: Small Arms and Individual Equipment Lessons Learned
Army battery charging problems solved: power inverters in HMMWV trucks NOW
Helmet NVG mount protection and rank/name ID: without 100 mph tape
MOLLE
rucksack failure: what do we do for a jump-capable rucksack?
Kosmo
MOUT lifeline: rescue your buddy out of the line of fire
Combat
Light: Soldiers Load Solution do-able right now!
Does Ecotat
have the Soldier's Load problem solved?
Winter
approaches: replace field jacket liners ASAP!
The Great 21st Century Rifle Controversy: is 5.56mm enough?
U.S. Army reports Afghan gear problems: 1st TSG (A) told them so, Soldiers
still getting ignored
Ground launched Hydra 70mm 2.75 inch rockets: Brazil makes the launcher we need
Ranger Rick Tscherne returns from the Balkans: creates SOS survival dog tag
necklace
Fighting "war" on terrorism handicapped: where is the tear gas?
No more hard plastic canteen jump injuries: flexible 1-qt canteens are here
New Army chinstrap will save lives IF we get it NOW, not in 10 years
"An Army of One, a Soldier for all"
WWII Airborne screen saver
1st TSG (A) discovers 108 Paratroopers can jump from a C-17!
Why can't the U.S. military land on water anymore?
Boeing Phantom Works adopts AMS-SG's WIG concept!
V-22: marine Colonel's lies about flying deathtrap exposed!
Fix USAF CAS: Air Commandos and 2-seat OA-10B Warthogs
Fix U.S. Army Close Fight Support: Attack Pathfinder AeroScouts
U.S. Army adopts 1st TSG (A) "RoboCobra" UCAV concept
The trouble with aircraft: they ain't--ground mobility needed
Why air strikes without decisive maneuver failed in Iraq and Kosovo
Got CAS? Charles Myers Maneuver Air Support can fix this
"Killer Bees": low-cost scout/attack aircraft for the 1st Cavalry Division
No future for U.S. Navy/marines without jet seaplanes
No Air Recon: how fighter pilot egos grounded the SR-71
WHAT'S REALLY GOING ON WITH THE STRYKER TRUCK DEBACLE?
Another 1st TSG (A) member writes in:
"Have you any idea where I can locate more information on the current status of the Stryker program as well as any information on how well it is performing in Iraq today?
This thing is a classic procurement boondoggle and will probably kill a bunch of kids."
A concerned citizen asks:
"After reading a lot of the stuff on your site,
I just can't understand why the Army uses Humvees so much.
They don't offer much protection at all. I also was
surprised about reports of certain units having to
improvise by adding armor plating on their trucks and
other vehicles. You are right about how this has lead to
quite a few deaths and it does not seem all that hard to
solve. Maybe someday someone will do something about this
because the Soldiers need better protection than
this."
1st TSG (A) REPLY: Here are some web pages we update:
.../strykerhorrors.htm
|
BREAKING NEWS! 1st TSG (A) EXCLUSIVE!
LAV-3/Strykerrs fail in Afghanistan; Canadians ditch their own wheeled trucks for more mobile and better armored tracks! Enter Leopards and M113 MTVL Gavins!
50 x 11-ton Canadian M113A3 Gavin "TLAVs" light tanks in Afghanistan with 42-ton Leopard C2 medium tanks in Combat
AR2007-A051-0261 15 May 2007 Kandahar, Afghanistan A Tracked LAV (TLAV) manoeuvres into position at Forward Operating Base Ghundi Gar. Having arrived as an escort for a resupply convoy the TLAV now takes up position as part of the Hotel Company Combat Team of the 2nd Battalion Royal Canadian Regiment Battle Group, currently in this location as part of OP HADRIAN. 2 RCR BG is an integral element of the Joint Task Force Afghanistan. Joint Task Force Afghanistan (JTF-Afg) is Canada?s contribution to NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan. The focus of this mission is to help Afghans rebuild their lives, families, communities and nation. Canadian Forces personnel in Afghanistan are working to improve the quality of life of Afghans by providing a more secure environment in which Afghan society can recover from more than 25 years of conflict. Photo by: Sgt Craig Fiander, JTF ? Afg, Image Technician www.sfu.ca/casr/np-afghan-06.htm
Armoured Vehicles - NATO/ISAF - Southern Afghanistan - December 2006
The Dutch are using M113 Gavin tracks, too and are being VERY successful in counter-insurgency operations! www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZKa3tK3zi4c
What caused the turn-around? COMBAT. REALITY. AFGHANISTAN. A DESIRE TO WIN, NOT CONTINUE TO LOSE IN WHEELED TRUCKS... EXPERIENCE ONE FAILURE DAY IN THE LIFE OF A FUBAR LAV-III/Strykerrr UNIT.... Strykers fail: VIDEO of Canadian LAV-IIIs hopelessly stuck in mud, breaks main bearing, mission aborted American Stryker versions of the LAV-III are even more bloated and weighted down with bird cage and electronics inside....why are we wasting $4M on each of these flat-bottom, road-bound trucks? From the recent PBS documentary, "Afghanistan: the Other War" Go to 2:58 and see why the Canadians have gone to tracks in Afghanistan like other smart armies, Brits, Dutch etc. Canadian LAV-IIIs hopelessly stuck in mud, breaks main bearing, mission aborted
We need to stop wasting billions on fatally flawed break-down-prone wheeled Stryker trucks that fail to get the job done and put our men into constant road/trail ambushes and put our money into M113 Gavin light for cross-country mobility but medium-weight in armor protection tracks that don't get stuck and break down in a mere light rain and minor mud. STILL PHOTOS OF THE LAV-III DEBACLE IN AFGHANISTAN (AMERICANS EXPERIENCE THIS DAILY, TOO)
2: "We are going to make contact with a new village and reach out to them and win over their hearts and minds in our low-maintenance, all-terrain, high-speed SASO wheeled vehicles. Our LAV-IIIs are used by the Americans who call them 'Strykers'".
3: "WAHOO! Look at Me! I'm going 60 miles per hour on the road!!" (Not for long!)
LAV-III stuck a 1st time; Road Speed: 0 MPH 4: "Ohhh....sh$%^&! I drove into a rut....."
5: "Can we get it out?"
6: "We had technical difficulties and had to cancel the mission to the village"
7: "What's that dangling underneath the LAV-III?"
8: "Oh No. Its the main bearing. Its broke, man. This thing won't run its trashed."
9: "What a Piece-of-Shit (POS)."
10: "Careful! Don't get the 'recovery' LAV-III stuck, too!"
11: "Oh Boy. The 'recovery' LAV-III is spinning in the mud, too."
12: "Please...please grip...grip....we don't want to be stuck here outside the wire when the sun goes down..."
LAV-III stuck a 2d time and now with "company": THE TOW TRUCK IS STUCK, TOO! 13: "Gun it!!! Get through the dip!"
14: "Damn! We are Stuck Again! Dude! It's Getting Dark!"
15: "We Got to get Back to the FOB before the Taliban come out!"
16: "Go Easy! Easy! Let the Wheels Catch!"
17: "Damn. Forget it. Cut the Engine!"
18: "Mission Aborted! Maybe an officer will figure this out."
"We REALLY showed our Afghan allies today why they should trust their very lives to us. Yeah, Right. We need to turn these pieces-of-shit in and get tracks so we can win"
Paul Hornback's Wheels vs. Tracks Article in the March-April 1998 issue of U.S. Army Armor magazine (before it became politicized) Warned Us Against the Wheeled SASO "Nation-Building" Racket EuroFad
![]()
1st TSG (A) EXCLUSIVE: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wheels/Tracks NRMM Study
Steel Tracked M113 Gavin went 75+ mph in 1979! There's NO justification for wheeled trucks on the non-linear battlefield! According to Hunnicutt Bradley: A History of American Fighting and Support Vehicles on page 109, the "Hot Rod" averaged 75.76 mph over a 500 foot gravel test track at Fort Knox in 1979. Power was 2 x 440 cubic inch Chrysler gas engines driving two modified 727 transmissions. Imagine what M113 Gavins would do today on band tracks with hybrid-electric drive!
www.combatreform2.com/bandtracks.htm ...thanks be to retired LTC Dave Tooker for finding these pictures!!
The Situational High Ground: Refusing Battle where the Enemy got there first
Its 1863. Robert E Lee's Confederate Army of Northern Virginia is on the march. For the first half of the American Civil War, the "Johnny Rebs" could out-march and out-fight the slow, cautious and conservative Union Army, taking the high ground first and waiting for them to charge blindly into their withering rifle fires. He is way up in Pennsylvania roaming about and the Union Army can't stop him. He is headed towards the general direction of the crossroads town of Gettysburg.
Where is the Union Army? What is it doing? Does it know where Lee is?
Union Cavalry General John Buford finds out.
When Lee gets to Gettysburg, he has a rude awakening: Buford's blue cavalry on horses was already there holding the high ground, and he has no JEB Stuart gray cavalry to push them off because their impulsive leader was on wild patrols seeking some "action". Dispatching the word to General Meade to send everything he's got to Gettysburg since he found the Confederate Army---in a battle of hours, soon the entire Union Army held the high ground and could entrench---which combat engineer Lee of all people would know--would mean he would have to fight uphill while the "damned Yankees" poured kinetic energy (KE) aka bullets and low explosives (LE) aka artillery fire into them.
Lee should have walked away and refused battle.
He did not.
Lee was more than anything else a southern military man full of "honor" and "pride"; vanities that no General commanding the lives of thousands of men should indulge. He decided he must attack the Union Army when they offered to do battle with him, even though the laws-of-physics deck-was-stacked against him lest his men think he was a "coward". He was a prisoner to his own vanity. After repeated charges and the loss of thousands upon thousands of men, Pickett's charge up Cemetery Ridge sealed the doom of the entire Confederate cause as from then on, they would never have the numbers to meet the swelling ranks of the industrialized Union Army in equal terms of either firepower or maneuver.
Had he REFUSED BATTLE and placed himself between the Union Army and Washington D.C., this would not have happened and Lee might have even taken our capital city and earned a negotiated war end with the south becoming its own nation-state, but his judgment was clouded by NARCISSISM. The North under Lincoln's leadership finally got the message: take or create the situational high ground. Lincoln soon thereafter put non-vain, practical warfighters in charge who knew that the proud, narcissist Confederates would never refuse battle, so he obliged them with battle-after-battle by Grant in the Wilderness wearing them down, while maneuverist mastermind Sherman in the south flying in two mobile columns free of railroad supply dependence offered them two choices for battle---and he ignored whichever choice they made---to instead destroy their logistical means to fight. The Civil War was won by no-non-sense operational maneuver and appreciation for the terrain but the history books are filled with romantic lusting over Stonewall Jackson, JEB Stuart and Lee's feel-good battlefield maneuvers and duels with the Union Army connected to no lasting political effects. They lost the war accordingly. Most career military people are narcissists who want to be seen of men, gaining their peer approval to "self-validate" themselves. It was only after 3 years of military disasters before enough of them were fired in enough quantities to clear the way for Chamberlains, Grants and Shermans to rise to command to win the war. Iraq is our Gettysburg In 2003, the invasion of Iraq, Operation Iraqi Freedom; we got there "first" with the U.S. Army's tracked mechanized 3rd Infantry Division taking Baghdad but didn't exploit the situational like a Buford by immediately getting reinforcements by rehiring Iraqi Army Soldiers and government workers we promised jobs to. To pump up our egos, we instead moved into former dictator palaces and built forward operating bases (FOBs) around them, surrendering the roads/trails to the enemies we created by disenfranchisement and constant civilian house raids looking for Saddam Hussein and his loyalists. Hussein & company had escaped because uber-narcissist marines mostly in wheeled trucks who "pride" themselves that they don't fight mobile mounted warfare (which is for "weak pussies" so they say) didn't know what they were doing and were thus easily ambushed and stopped so they were 6 days late reaching their sector of Baghdad. Another failure was the unimaginative heavy tankers at CENTCOM who did not even make capturing Saddam a task on their to-do list and wimpy 173rd Paratroopers who sat & held as 1st Infantry Division troopers in M113 Gavins and a handful of M1 Abrams heavy and M2 Bradley medium tanks flown in one-C-17-load-at-a-time into the seized airfield in Northern Iraq who did not employ decisive 3D air-mech maneuver to "close the back door" from Baghdad to Saddam's home town in Tikrit. With Americans on a 9-to-5 routine in the FOBs like it was garrison and they were being sent out on lawn care missions: the rebels were then free since we neither looking or there on the ground 24/7/365 to stop them from laying roadside bombs and drive their car bombs into civilian areas to slaughter them. Instead, we began doing Robert E. Lees: either daily "Pickett's Charges" down landmine filled roads in wheeled trucks or large sweeps that created more rebels than they found. The daily sight of burning Humvee /Stryker trucks does not inspire any confidence in the civilian populace that we can defend them nor strike any fear or "respect" in the minds of our enemies. Our willingness to die stupidly does not impress even those with their own nihilist death cult mentalities if its a result of our own INCOMPETENCE. Slapping armor onto Humvee s and buying expensive Canadian Stryker or V-hull shaped wheeled trucks to feed our narcissism does not work for long if at all and I have been warning everyone in DoD since my U.S. Naval Institute Proceedings article in November 1989 about thes | |||